ATLAS

The research and testing layer behind Executive Compass™

ATLAS develops and challenges the rules used to examine financial evidence, explanation and decision support.

Active research and development Evidence rules Critical testing

What ATLAS does

Test the claim, the evidence and the limit of the conclusion.

ATLAS tests whether a claim is clear enough to examine, whether the evidence supports it and where the conclusion stops being reliable. Weak assumptions are revised or removed.

ATLAS / RESEARCH SYSTEM INSTRUMENT / V0.1 CONSTRUCT · EVIDENCE · BOUNDARY · FALSIFY · CALIBRATE · REVISE
Project ATLAS Test
the rule
Revise weak assumptions

Experienced professionals are invited to review fictional cases and identify ambiguity, bias and methodological weakness.

Help test Executive Compass™

The working rule

Friendly examples prove very little.
06

The work follows six recurring activities. Each one is designed to expose weak reasoning before it becomes a public or commercial conclusion.

Public and private boundary

Publish the practical standard. Keep the detailed test machinery controlled.

Executive Compass™ publishes the problem, the practical consequence and the standard expected of a defensible conclusion.

ATLAS keeps the detailed instruments, case design, evidence weighting, reference bands and adjudication rules private. This protects the research programme and avoids presenting provisional work as established proof.

Current status

Active research and development.

ATLAS is an active research and development programme. Its methods are being developed and tested.

No public statement should describe the work as validated, certified or scientifically proven.

Relationship to client work

Executive Compass™ provides the work. ATLAS tests the reasoning behind it.

Executive Compass™ provides diagnostic and advisory work. ATLAS tests the reasoning behind that work.

That separation matters. Client language must remain practical; research claims must remain provisional.

Independent pretesting

Useful criticism is more valuable than easy agreement.